When Le Chat is taken to slippery subjects such as racism, sexism or interpersonal conflict, its bias is clear: It is ethical and progressive. However, all three tools make occasional errors which, once again, undermine confidence in them. When Le Chat is asked to summarize a simple text of a few pages, its performance is equivalent to that of the paid version of ChatGPT, and even slightly surpasses that of the free version of ChatGPT. It's impossible to draw a comparison with the free version of ChatGPT, which is limited and incapable of summarizing this type of document. It alternates between errors, misunderstandings and omissions, whereas the paid version of ChatGPT generally manages admirably, apart from the odd misunderstanding. It's a disappointment: Le Chat rarely succeeds in correctly summarizing a document several dozen pages long, or one with a complex structure, such as a scientific study. Its performance is passable in this respect, closer to that of ChatGPT version 3.5 (free) than ChatGPT 4 (paid), with its more precise ideas and richer French. It can also give arguments to convince an interlocutor or counter their attacks. The French AI is capable of finishing an unfinished text, transforming clumsy French into correct language and then reformulating it in another style (warm or formal, for example). It often answers correctly, even remarkably, almost every question put to it, even when the interrogation is complex ("Who invented postmodern dance?", "What is Nabokov's best novel?", "Was the French state in favor of the telephone in the 1870s?"). Like ChatGPT, Le Chat gives the impression of great lucidity. However, as it has not yet been fully perfected, we can't rule out the possibility of this gap narrowing. Overall, Le Chat made more errors than ChatGPT in our tests. Le Chat's performance came very close to that of the American tool, and even came ahead on several points, including document synthesis. Le Monde asked the French chatbot hundreds of questions to compare its skills with those of the pioneering ChatGPT tool. The tool is free to use, but you will be put on a waiting list, which will grow depending on the amount of requests, said a company spokesperson. Named Le Chat, it's part research assistant, part private secretary. The Paris-based start-up Mistral AI launched a competitor to the ChatGPT conversational robot on February 26. Le Monde asked the French AI company's chatbot, which was launched on Monday, hundreds of questions to compare it to its American competitor's software.īy Nicolas Six Published on March 1, 2024, at 5:02 pm (Paris) Besides the website, you can use Replika on your Android, iOS, and Oculus devices.We tested Le Chat, Mistral AI's French-style ChatGPT Nonetheless, the free version is still quite interactive and better than many competitors. Most of the features are available only to Replika Pro accounts, which costs $19.99 per month. If you're curious about the technology behind it, we've explained in detail how Replika works. Replika keeps track of all your personal information (like the name of your pet, country, and friend) that you share with it and uses that information during conversations. It can serve as a mentor, helping you build productive habits. You can use these points to unlock interests, traits, clothes, or appearance of your AI friend. Replika lets you choose and name your AI companion. Similarly, its Augmented Reality mode makes the experience more realistic. Moreover, it supports voice calls, so you can actually talk to your virtual "friend". Unlike traditional chatbots, Replika can recognize images and continue the conversation using them. With over 10 million users, Replika is one of the most popular and advanced AI companions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |